SYNOPSIS
Sentenced to Marriage may seem like a contentious title, but upon seeing this documentary, you will understand why it is titled so. The film starts with the scene of a very happy wedding. Five years later, the bride appears in court to file for a divorce. Since Israeli law states that divorce is only valid when her husband consents under the jurisdiction of a rabbi (which was enacted in 1953), women who want to divorce desperately continue to struggle against this law. This documentary illustrates the struggle of three women who want to get a divorce. Wives barely make husbands who have even his concubine enjoying their rights on a guarantee of religion stand at the bar but there are only rabbi¡¯s unilateral sermons toward the wives. They ejaculate the painful outcries outside the court and shout that they will pay money if divorce is possible. They even make a rapid on the husband¡¯s flirtatious scene to get a divorce. It is doubtful whether the country is democratic in the 21st century.
Can we take pity on these women, though? Considering that we still live in a country that, even after the recent abrogation of the system, people insist on keeping the male-dominated family registration system. This film attempts to persuade the audiences that it is urgent to continuously mention the injustice and disturbance of these women¡¯s rights. (Jenna Ku)
PROGRAM NOTE
Sentenced to Marriage may seem like a contentious title, but upon seeing this documentary, you will understand why it is titled so. The film starts with the scene of a very happy wedding. Five years later, the bride appears in court to file for a divorce. Since Israeli law states that divorce is only valid when her husband consents under the jurisdiction of a rabbi (which was enacted in 1953), women who want to divorce desperately continue to struggle against this law. This documentary illustrates the struggle of three women who want to get a divorce. Wives barely make husbands who have even his concubine enjoying their rights on a guarantee of religion stand at the bar but there are only rabbi¡¯s unilateral sermons toward the wives. They ejaculate the painful outcries outside the court and shout that they will pay money if divorce is possible. They even make a rapid on the husband¡¯s flirtatious scene to get a divorce. It is doubtful whether the country is democratic in the 21st century.
Can we take pity on these women, though? Considering that we still live in a country that, even after the recent abrogation of the system, people insist on keeping the male-dominated family registration system. This film attempts to persuade the audiences that it is urgent to continuously mention the injustice and disturbance of these women¡¯s rights. (Jenna Ku)